> > > Hi. > > In the next day or so some of us will cooperate to bring to the > attention of all effected AS's information about infected users in their > net-space.
That would be "affected". > This will be coordinated with several groups and organizations. Please > expect these emails, thanks. In other words, NANOG is a step child of these and we'll only see the PR? If you're going to keep the mitigations off of NANOG, it's probably safe to keep it all off. We all read newspapers, blogs, and slashdot. I'll post my pre-94 copy of the Compuserve Directory if someone can prove this story didn't come from this list: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1915070,00.asp SANS has it, but they aren't being authoritative about it, quoting elsewhere: http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1067 I'd love to see the US authoritative sources jump in on these and advise us to cough up our dimes for the dances or not. -M<
