In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> certified validation of prefix ownership (and path, as has been
>> pointed out) would be great. it's clearly a laudable goal and seemed
>> like the right way to go. but right now, no one is doing it. the
>> rfcs that's i've found have all expired. and the conversation about
>> it has reached the point where people seem to have stopped even
>> disagreeing about how to do it. in short, it's as dead as dns-sec.
>> so what are we do do in the meantime?
>
>Perhaps people should stop trying to have these
>operational discussions in the IETF and take the
>discussions to NANOG where network operators gather.
We have tried, of course; see, for example, NANOG 28 (Salt Lake City).
There was no more consensus at NANOG than in the IETF...
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
