On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:35:02 +0100, "Kurt Erik Lindqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On 2 mar 2006, at 21.42, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > Putting routing decisions > > into the transport layer (4) as it is done or proposed with SCTP and > > SHIM6 is Total Evilness(tm) in my book. > > Not that shim6 is a change to transport though, but a change at layer > 3... >
Isn't the fact that shim6 doesn't affect the forwarding-plane of routers an argument that is used to its advantage? It seems more like something mingling the transport and session layers if anyone ask me (not that the old iso-model is all that relevant anymore imho). //per -- Per Heldal http://heldal.eml.cc/