On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:22:33 PST, Jo Rhett said: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Or perhaps there's a more reasonable explanation like being assimilated > > with Level3 and perhaps some contact info. is a little stale at this > > point in the merger process... Never attribute to malfeasance what can > > be explained by everyday corporate beauracracy. > > I'm missing the point where I am supposed to care. The regulations > concerning proper contact information don't mention this exception. > > Complete and utter incompetence (ie spam filtering their abuse mailbox) are > to blame for mail being rejected, and the phone numbers being out of date > are their fault, not a valid excuse.
If anything, it's *easier* to deal with clued providers that have misplaced their moral compass and gone pink, than to deal with mere stupidity. Alas, both types of sites are present in sufficient numbers to overwhelm almost anybody's ability to continue caring....
pgprIPvE6JvjQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
