It's legal to have broken NTP server in ANY country, and it's legal in most (by number) countries to send counter-attack (except USA as usual, where lawyers want to get their money and so do not allow people to self-defence).
So, it can be a GOOD prtactice in reality. But, of course, not in USA. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Dupuy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism > > To keep this operational: Operationally the network operator should > contact a lawyer before doing something like this. > > Purposely and knowingly sending bad data in order to do harm is a > counter-attack. As such it might be vigilantism, which is illegal in > most countries. Or it might be self-defense, which is not illegal. > Might. Contact a lawyer. > > John > > At 07:36 PM 4/10/2006, Simon Lyall wrote: > > >On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > One particular piece of crapware of the tucows archive variety would retry > > > once per second if it hadn't heard a response - but a ICMP Port Unreachable > > > would trigger an *immediate* query, so it would basically > > re-query at whatever > > > the RTT for the path was. > > > >I've said in other forums the only solution for this sort of software is > >to return the wrong time (by several months). The owner might actually > >notice then and fix the problem. > > > >Just not returning anything means the time still works on the querying > >device (especially if it uses multiple servers) and the problem will not > >be noticed and it will continue. > > > >-- > >Simon J. Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/ > >"To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT. >