On 4/18/06, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vendors like it because it's a revenue boost. It obviously requires > build-ahead > capacity and maintenance of overload capacity that will likely sit > idle for 99% > of it's life span. Who pays? > > [ ..hears ISP product managers scurrying to create "PriortyVPN" or > "priority vpn" products as a result... heh -> implied trademark here] >
Probably sell them a product where b/w is burstable to a much higher level - at least for short periods of time, to deal with sudden use spikes (or to create extra capacity for those periodic trojan outbreaks that will otherwise simply max their pipe out)
