On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:55:40AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> > Wouldn't they want to hijack more specifics to spam?
> 
> no.  see nick feamster's work, and the lightning talk i proxied
> for him in dallas.

Here are the links from our observations on this, from our Feb NANOG talk:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/nick-feamster.pdf

and our SIGCOMM paper:
http://sigcomm06.stanford.edu/discussion/showpaper.php?paper_id=28%22

Cheers,
Nick

Reply via email to