-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Philip Lavine wrote: > To all, > > Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a > rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my > other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to > the Internet via the same ISP_A. I am using the same AS for both routes. > > For some reason on my rtr advertising the 2.2.2.2 rte I am unable to see the > 1.1.1.1 rte "% Network not in table". I know 1.1.1.1 rte is valid it shows up > in looking glass and ISP_A has it on the peer 2.2.2.2 recevies full Internet > rtes from. Further verification: I add a static rte on 2.2.2.2 rtr to 1.1.1.1 > and its routable??? > > How is this possible? I have the following filters but I removed them and it > seems to not make a diff. > OUTBOUND - ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$ > ip as-path access-list 1 deny .* > INBOUND - ip as-path access-list 2 permit .* >
Loop protection. Throw away any route I hear from someone else with my AS. - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFXc3VE1XcgMgrtyYRAkUqAJ0WYsnAikAZnQc4tldqthD9f4TtBwCg8aUO OE57J9SYPYPRwue7VCUPvec= =3Cki -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----