On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 17:46 +0000, Chris L. Morrow wrote: > which brings us back to my original comment: "we need a policy most likely > from ICANN that requires some action based on proper documentation and > evidence or wrong-doing/malfeasance. That policy needs to dictate some > monetary penalties for non-compliance."
It's too late to put the genie back in the bottle. The only way to change the policy before the contract term ends is to either move ICANN out of US jurisdiction (to brake contract terms) or to organise a grass-root uprising to replace ICANNs root with something else. //per
