please elaborate. My knowledge of IPv6 is admittedly lacking, but I always assumed that the routing tables would be much larger if the internet were to convert from IPv4 due to the sheer number of networks available.
Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/08/2007 06:49 PM To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, nanog <nanog@merit.edu>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Justin M. Streiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject Re: How Not to Multihome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm really interested to see what happens when we start filling those > same routers with ipv6 routes. All 970 of them? joelja > > > *Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 10/08/2007 06:10 PM > > > To > "Justin M. Streiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > nanog <nanog@merit.edu> > Subject > Re: How Not to Multihome > > > > > > > > > >> It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their own >> announcements is definitely the Right Way to go. > > it is interesting, and worrysome, to consider this in light of likely > growth in the routing table (ref ipv4 free pool run out discussion) and > vendors' inability to handle large ribs and fibs on enterprise class > routers. > > randy > > >
