In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:52:11 -0500 (EST)
>Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I just wish the IETF would acknowledge this and go ahead and define a
>> DNS bit for artificial DNS answers for all these "address correction" and
>> "domain parking" and "domain tasting" people to use for their keen
>> "Web 2.0" ideas.
>
>Yes, let's let the IETF go off for 7 years to debate and try to put
>into an RFC something else that won't actually be used. Sorry Sean,
>you've lost me on this one. :-)
>
>John
You already have the bits for SE (and other signed
infrastructure zones) that allow you to detect when this
sort of garbage is pulled. All you have to do is deploy
a DNSSEC aware resolver.
Mark
