--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'd also be interested to know what you'd *want* if you were asked how you'd like to structure IPv6 addressing, if you didn't have any history of having to be conservative with IPv4 addressing. IOW, imagine IPv4 didn't exist, and therefore your thinking about IPv6 isn't influenced by your history with IPv4. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If I wasn't worried about routing table size (you said "if you didn't have any history...imagine IPv4 didn't exist") I wouldn't give household and SOHO networks billions of addresses. scott
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Mark Andrews
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Joe Greco
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Mark Smith
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Randy Bush
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Mark Smith
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Joe Maimon
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Scott Weeks
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Scott Weeks
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Lou Katz
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cust... Jeroen Massar
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Scott Weeks
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line cust... Simon Lyall
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line ... Randy Bush
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased l... Simon Lyall
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leas... Randy Bush
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Leo Bicknell
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL &... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Brandon Butterworth
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Leigh Porter
- RE: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers John van Oppen
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Scott Weeks