Rod Beck wrote:
Ironically, the Net Neutrality debate is about the access providers
trying to impose usage-based pricing through the backdor - on the
content providers. It goes without saying I oppose it. It's the end
users who decide what they view and hence ultimately generate the
traffic flows. So the end users should be subject to the usage-based
pricing.
Concur. However, comma, if governments are charging taxes (such as the
EU) it leads to the question of what people pay taxes *for* - and paying
more taxes because they use the internet more would mean those that use
more would pay more in usage fees and pay more in taxes - which runs
completely against the stacks of documents written about equality on the
internet. Not taking a side on that, but it is an interesting point to
chew on - realistically, a balance would have to be struck.
And, as an aside, the Network Neutrality issue affects the globe and is
only being debated in one country.
--
Taran Rampersad
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.knowprose.com
http://www.your2ndplace.com
http://www.opendepth.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/knowprose/
"Criticize by Creating" - Michelangelo
"The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine." -
Nikola Tesla