--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To me there is no question of whether or not you filter traffic for > residential broadband customers. SBC in my area (Dallas) went from wide open to outbound 25 blocked by default/opened on request. I think doing the same thing with port 22 would hardly be an undue burden on users, and would help keep botnets in check. ------------------------------------------------ Might as well do TCP 20, 21 and 23, too. Woah, that slope's getting slippery! scott
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Robert Beverly
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Danny McPherson
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Mark Tinka
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Jo Rhett
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Christopher Morrow
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Scott Weeks
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dave Pooser
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Scott Weeks
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Carpenter, Jason
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dave Pooser
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Andy Dills
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Dave Pooser
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Mark Foster
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Joel Jaeggli
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk - iNAME
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk - iNAME