On Sun, 27 May 2007, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > There are many things in Vista, and hopefully more to come, which prefer > IPv6 for peer-to-peer. And even if the ISPs don't offer IPv6 at all, hosts > use 6to4 or Teredo to automatically provide the required IPv6 connectivity. is there a global-ipv6 -> terado gateway in existence yet? If not... it's not ipv6 connectivity. It's nat-traversal to a 'private' network which happens to use ipv6 addressing. Things like 6to4 won't really scale as a solution either :( if comcast's 20m clients wake up and 6to4 tunnel tomorrow someone's 6to4 tunnel server is going to be in big trouble :( (same for the 7.5m verizon dsl customers, which reminds me I need to get back to playing some more with a 6to4 gateway again) Anyway, Terado had always seemed like a nice solution to not the ipv6 transition problem.
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jeroen Massar
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward
- Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Jeroen Massar
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted william(at)elan.net
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted william(at)elan.net
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Manolo Hernandez
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Manolo Hernandez
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Alexander Harrowell
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Andy Davidson
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky