In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:21:09PM -0400, Joe Provo wrote: > Content is irrelevent. BT is a protocol-person's dream and an ISP > nightmare. The bulk of the slim profit margin exists in taking > advantage of stat-mux oversubscription. BT blows that out of the > water.
I'm a bit confused by your statement. Are you saying it's more cost effective for ISP's to carry downloads thousands of miles across the US before giving them to the end user than it is to allow a local end user to "upload" them to other local end users? Is this only a biproduct of the centralized downloads being throttled by thousands of miles of network, and/or a single centralized server? -- Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
pgppGZH8HH8mT.pgp
Description: PGP signature