Mike Lieman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:06:48 -0400 >> > From: "Mike Lieman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > http://www.news.com/2100-1034_3-6237715.html >> > > >> > >> > It's a FUD attempt to get people to forget about how AT&T owes >> > everyone in the US with a telephone a check for $150,000.00 in >> > statutory penalties for their unlawful spying. > > If it's impossible to hold AT&T accountable for violating the Law in > such a blatant, wholesale manner, how could anyone believe that they > could be held accountable to whatever Network Neutrality standards > would be ensconced in Law? >
Are we really going to get into politics here? I smell trolls. -- Jeff Shultz _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog