Martin,
You know the phrase "Paris is worth a mass"? Well, we get .paris, as
well as .cat, and other reasonable things, plus chaff and clutter.
Eric
Martin Hannigan wrote:
Eric;
The only reason I would have supported rejecting the proposal is the 'morality' language related to offensive TLD's. .
What's your take on that part of the process?
Marty
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Hannigan
Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri Jun 27 10:57:15 2008
Subject: Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
Martin,
I wasn't that impressed with Dave's remarks, but I heard them rather
than read them, which may have made a difference. I agree with your
views on the substance and spirit of Susan's and Wendy's statements.
This -- the new GTLD process -- was originally scheduled to get to
completion in 2003 and 2004 -- after the initial 2000 round.
Eric
Martin Hannigan wrote:
See pages 17 - 20 of
https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf
See pages 22 - 25 of
https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf
I think that this is a good read as well, especially the comments by Dave Wodeley, Susan Crawford, and Wendy Seltzer.
https://par.icann.org/files/paris/BoardMeeting_26June08.txt
Best,
Martin
