Confirmed outage on their side. Should be resolved now. Drive Slow, Paul Wall
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Scott Berkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've also been seeing some "weird" (hard to track down) issues all day > with Level 3 in both Tampa and Atlanta, especially from our NMS systems > monitoring systems all over the place. > > My contact at Level 3 didn't know of anything going on and couldn't really > find anything. Anyone else have a Level 3 response? > > -Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Beckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Level 3 TPA routing today? > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, david raistrick wrote: > >> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, David Hubbard wrote: >> >>> Anyone seeing issues with Level 3 between anywhere >>> and Tampa, particularly Atlanta and Dallas? We've >> >> Internap just reported problems with L3 out of Miami: >> >> "we are seeing latency, minor packet loss and path problems to a >> number of destinations and other PNAPs via our Level3 (AS3356) upstream >> connection in the MIA003 PNAP. " > > I've been seeing 30-70% packet loss between Cox Business and Level3 from > DC to NY since 8:17pm EDT. Maybe via Internap? > > Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst > StDev > 3. mrfddsrj01-ge706.rd.dc.cox.n 0.0% 100 2.4 5.1 2.2 51.9 > 8.3 > 4. xe-9-2-0.edge1.Washington1.L 67.0% 100 2.5 6.8 2.4 41.6 > 8.6 > 5. vlan99.csw4.Washington1.Leve 69.0% 100 2.7 8.3 2.6 23.7 > 5.0 > 6. ae-93-93.ebr3.Washington1.Le 68.0% 100 3.0 9.9 2.7 30.9 > 6.3 > 7. ae-3.ebr3.NewYork1.Level3.ne 70.0% 100 10.5 15.8 8.1 44.2 > 8.8 > 8. ae-83-83.csw3.NewYork1.Level 71.0% 100 18.9 14.2 8.1 42.0 > 7.1 > 9. ae-31-89.car1.NewYork1.Level 66.0% 100 8.6 25.7 8.5 165.4 > 41.7 > > Beckman > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Peter Beckman Internet > Guy > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.angryox.com/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > >