On 9/6/08, Anton Kapela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > found a network operator using uRPF on Cisco gear. > > (note: network operator. it's probably fine for several-hundred-meg > > enterprise sites) > > > Forgive me, but what does bits/sec have to do with anything? >
it's possible that on some platforms the uRPF check happens on the main processor, or on a linecard processor. So, bps rates (proxied for by pps rates) matter greatly, on those platforms. -Chris