On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Since this appears to be somebody who is contracting with lots of US providers, their identity is presumably known. This discussion has now been going on for long enough that it's presumably passed the emergency, "act now; think later," phase. Should what they're doing be a law enforcement issue, rather than a "they've got cooties" issue?

It wasn't an emergency except a PR emergency for the transit providers.

As to a law enforcement issue, it probably is for 4 years now... which comes to show why we are the ones protecting the network. They will probably become more useful in the future.

        Gadi.


-Steve


Reply via email to