On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Michael Sinatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers. >>> They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 with >> >> traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside >> 701) oh, not working... >> traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either. >> >> vzb's v6 table is far from complete :( which is pretty painful. > > And it just reinforces the fear that people have against putting AAAA > records in DNS for their publicly-accessible resources, especially www.
if you want v6 adoption... latency, path length, jitter, performance all should closely match v4 specs. Expecting a US customer to be 'ok' with 300ms to reach a US site 30 miles (as the crow flies) via Germany... not good. V6 so far doesn't have the same $$ and interest from the 'user' so it's not being optomized yet. Or so it seems. -chris