In message <8c5f1fec-ff51-4ba2-a762-c13bc275e...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad
writes:
> It would seem that as ISPs implement DPI and protocol-specific traffic
> shaping, they damage the arguments that they can make claiming they
> have "common carrier" status with the inherent immunities that status
> provides. I can hear the argument now: if an ISP can throttle
> BitTorrent (or whatever) for specific nodes, why can't they also limit
> the source addresses of packets coming from those nodes?
They can and should. I suspect many of them do as they
usually apply these filters to home networks.
BCP 38 is ~10 years old now. It should have been factored
into the purchasing decision of all the current equipement.
If it wasn't then the operator was negligent.
Mark
> Regards,
> -drc
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: mark_andr...@isc.org
