On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:08:44 +1030, Matthew Moyle-Croft <m...@internode.com.au> wrote: > > Let's face it - the current v6 assignment rules are to solve a 1990s set > of problems. A /64 isn't needed now that we have DHCP(v6).
It's needed to prevent people from NATing in v6, as they'll still want their stuff behind a firewall, and some of them will want subnets. > Setting the idea in people's heads that a /64 IS going to be their own > statically is insane and will blow out provider's own routing tables > more than is rational. No larger than their ARP tables are now.
