On 2/17/09, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > > I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated > > the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on > track. of course, to save face, the name has to be changed. > > > with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining > > these with NAT-PT could help with the transition > > cgn is not a transition tool. it is a dangerous hack to deal with > the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient > space to number their customer edge. > > randy > > Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out dual stacks to the CPE.
-brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.400.6992 Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com