> > 2) Some end-node box with a IPv6 stack from "Joe's Software Emporium > > and > > Bait-n-Tackle" sees an RA packet, and concludes that since RA and > > DHCPv6 > > are mutually exclusive, to ignore any DHCPv6 packets it sees, and > > hilarity > > ensues. > > > They are not mutually exclusive, DHCPv6 *requires* RA.
In your previous Nanog message you said: > DHCPv6 can operate without RA now. Please make up your mind. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
