In a message written on Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:01:59AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: > <some-hat-on> > Would it be insane to have an IETF back-to-back with a NANOG? > </some-hat-on>
Probably, but it would be a good idea. :)
I have no idea how the IETF agenda is set, but that may be part of
the trick. I suspect network operators care a lot about protocols
at lower layers in the stack, and less and less at higher levels
in the stack.
SeND, DHCP, the RA stuff are all very important to us; some new
header field in HTTP or IMAP much less so. Since IETF is usually
5 days, it would be nice if that lower level stuff could be adjacent
to NANOG.
--
Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
pgp7YlpkSI0Vr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
