Agreed, I noticed the single IX as well and asked them about it in my email. If they don't expand aggressively in the next ~6 months, they're going to have a very problematic launch.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > > Yeah, I'm going to send them an email and see if I can get ahold of > their peering policy. > > I'm hoping they will update it as they get more attention from other > networks. They may just be procrastinating > > setting things up. According to bgp.he.net they are only announcing one > v4 /24 and one v6 /48, which could be > > enough IPs, but seems a little on the small side. > > I'd be much more worried about only being on one IX than only advertising > a single /24 and /48. I'm guessing they've just not fully fleshed out the > peeringdb entry and maybe not fully built out the network infrastructure > yet. A CDN, with everything coming from one POP in NY is not going to cut > it. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route > | therefore you are > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ >