Using Orifice 342 will hurt you.
Packet loss (the more the better) will only help you. -- The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. >-----Original Message----- >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka >Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2019 15:50 >To: Robert Webb >Cc: NANOG list >Subject: Re: QoS for Office365 > > > >On 8/Jul/19 21:03, Robert Webb wrote: >> I took the OP's request as for doing QoS at the edge of their >network >> and not necessarily the entire path. > >Indeed, but even then, you could be handing off the traffic to a >downstream customer, and can't guarantee what they do to those ToS >fields. > > >> >> As another person stated, the real answer is to add more bandwidth >if >> you are having to QoS to Office365 because it is affecting other >> internet based services. > >Yes and no. > >More bandwidth never hurt anyone, but packet loss in the remote >network >toward the cloud will hurt you. > >Mark.
