This is not surprising to me as Dlink was one of my co-authors for RFC8585 ...
and they indicated in v6ops that implementing CLAT was really easy. I guess
they need to improve the GUI, etc.
Note that with 464XLAT, you still need the NAT64 at the ISP side, and also, the
traceroutes will shows something weird, so not trustable unless you understand
very well how it works. However, testing a web site or other services will work
fine.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 5/8/19 3:45, "NANOG en nombre de Philip Loenneker" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org
en nombre de philip.loenne...@tasmanet.com.au> escribió:
Moving away from the discussion around what technology people may choose to
go with, and instead what CPEs may be suitable...
I know this is 464XLAT rather than MAP-E that was originally requested, but
recent versions of D-Link firmware, eg for the DVA-2800, include the CLAT
functionality. My testing in November last year showed that it only partially
worked, with the traceroutes to 64:ff9b::1.1.1.1 working, but it would not
automatically translate a traceroute to 1.1.1.1 to the IPv6 version. There have
been a few new revisions since then and it is on my to-do list to re-test
things, but I haven't had the time.
It is also worth noting that, in the original firmware revision I tested, I
had to manually enter the URL for the CLAT configuration screen. It simply
wasn't on the menu. On another version, it had a link to DS-Lite configuration,
and from there you get a link to the CLAT options. It is possible that other
devices and/or vendors also have this option, or options for similar
technologies such as MAP-E, but they just don't have a link to it in the
interface.
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta
Sent: Monday, 5 August 2019 11:07 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MAP-E
Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Or the case of Playstation network. Yes they WILL blacklist your CGN
> just the same as they can blacklist a shared MAP ip address. Except it
> affects more users.
If IP address sharing by blocks of ports becomes common and there is
typical block size (say, 1024), blacklisting will be done block-wise.
Masataka Ohta
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
