On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 09:04:03 +0900, Masataka Ohta said: > > All I see there is some handwaving about separating something from > > something else, without even a description of why it was better than > > what was available when you wrote the draft. > > Read the first three paragraphs of abstract of the draft:
And it doesn't actually explain why it's better. It says it's different, but doesn't give reasons to do it other than "it's different". > Read the title of the draft. The draft is not intended to describe > protocol details. In other words, you have a wish list, not a workable idea. > > Try attaching an actual protocol specification > > Read the title of the draft. The Architecture of End to End Multihoming However, the draft is lacking in any description of an actual architecture. Read RFC1518, which *does* describe an architecture, and ask yourself what's in that RFC that isn't in your draft.
pgp3DEuIMI5Qp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
