There’s also this gem from 2005 or 2007 days. I’ve heard Cisco staff was 
involved in its creation.

http://www.mattzrelak.com/mp3/t1down.htm

—Chris

> On Sep 5, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> See below for high value of the list, both items are very pleasing
> 
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:10 AM Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
> On 05/09/2019 08:09, Kasper Adel wrote:
> 
> No.  This is art & tech from 12 years ago:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
> 
> -Hank
> 
>> In SPRING a time when segment and routing had no mismatch, a time when isis 
>> and ospf ate a forbidden encap, all they had to do was forward bgp like its 
>> hot, but crazy flapping doesnt leave any real LDP without some real FSM 
>> check, My dynamic unnumbered neighbor.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Suddenly, Out of order, an AS is overridden, we see frames dropping, we 
>> sniff a bit and it turns out, sfps are burning, we are in a place right now 
>> where ping and pong are jittery, their latency is tested, they cant 
>> strengthen their icmp bond with a warm bfd message, how can they keep 
>> everyone in ACK, safe from teardown and dampening, with this kind of ixp 
>> relationship??! but oh admin, we know forwarding works in its own mysterious 
>> ways. We are left with two non rfc compliant scavengers, bastard 802.1ah 
>> fools in a leaky yet shaped, buffer display of some runts and nimbles, and a 
>> giant too. 
>> 
>> They start their life of a packet, leaving one interface to a neighbor, from 
>> an adjacency to a peer, an endless loop, its a prefix hijack, but as they 
>> move from one stack to another, finding their way through a tunnel of memory 
>> failures and RMAs, one hell of an LSP ride, through firewall horrors and MTU 
>> mismatches, leaving behind, a sea of syslog messages and snmp alarms. 
>> Anyway, Their ttl expired and one funny access list abruptly denies them 
>> life, sending them to Null0, where they can be peacefully discarded.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thats what tech does to yeh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to