In message <d6411136-73d4-9712-5303-2e364bb29...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta <mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
>Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > So, if you are looking for a Crime here, i.e. one defined under law, > > there isn't one. > >You don't know how broadly crime of fraud is defined by the current code. > >Just injecting false route information may not be a crime. > >However, doing so for financial gain maybe a crime of fraud. I guess that there is something that either you, or perhaps I, are not understanding here. Did you mean to suggest that either Mr. Cohen or any of the friendly networks that he has persuaded to announce routes for him (by paying them to do so) are doing any of this just for their health? Financial gain appears to me to be the obvious motivation for all of this. >False registration for financial gain by deceiving a registrar >is definitely a crime, regardless of what is registered. > >See the actual code: > > https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2015C00507 Allow me to clarify. In the case if the APNIC region blocks that I have called out, I have -no- evidence to suggest that there has been any deception or untoward manipulation of registry information whatsoever. With respect to the AFRINIC region blocks I have called out, if you have a relevant citation from the criminal code of the island nation of Mauritius, I would be most appreciative if you would share that with me. It may come in handy at some point. Regards, rfg
