On 03/10/2019 12:11, Masataka Ohta wrote: >> Sources, please. (Disclaimer: I'm in the UK.) > > John Levine already mentioned "Internet Watch Foundation".
Sure, but the IWF was always intended to stop people accessing paedophilia accidentally. It has always been well understood for there to be many ways around that filtering. The IWF's more important role is to identify these sources and to work with the authorities against them. There's more here: https://www.iwf.org.uk/what-we-do/why-we-exist/our-remit-and-vision > So, people who want to make money from child porn has been > trying to have censorship of various degree. > > In UK, they are very successful. Importantly, and I am happy to accept this was simply a translation issue, but what you said here with both paragraphs together, made it look as if you were suggesting that in the UK we are very successful in making money from child pornography *by censoring* child pornography? -- Tom
