On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 15:22, Lukas Tribus <li...@ltri.eu> wrote: > I agree this is something that should to be discussed, but to get > there it's probably a very long road. Just look at the sorry state of > BGP filtering itself. And this requires even more precision, > automation,carefulness and *process changes*.
BGP is broken, because it can be. If it could not be, it would not be. This would make BGP filters market driven fact. Instead of nice thing some nerds care about. Transition would invariably cause some gray hairs, but Internet is robust against technical and non-technical problems. -- ++ytti
