On Wednesday 2019-10-23 17:18, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:

I use my own personal domain name for various UNIX stuff, including sending
log-related things to myself out of cron, which end up in my own Gmail.com
account, either directly, or through forwarding (w/o SRS).  (I do not use G
Suite for my own domain name, for obvious reasons; just the consumer-based
gmail.com email address from the old times of invitation-based
registrations.)

Too bad you don't use G Suite as it allows you to notate incoming relays where Gmail does not. It is possible that authenticating (logging in as y...@gmail.com) would help you get them delivered to your INBOX.

A couple of months ago, I setup some new scripts that would send me new
nightly emails.  It's all plain text, but had a few dozen of domain names
present (it's logs).  Absolutely no links, just plenty of domains which I
don't control.  So, Gmail has been presenting most of these messages with
their red warning label that the email contains malicious links, even
though all of these emails contained zero links, zero URLs to any of these
unknown domain names, zero URL schemes, zero "http://";, zero "https://";
etc.  You get the idea.

Many an MUA would convert the anything.knowntld (and other) strings (some don't even check for known TLDs) into clickable links if no adjacent URL was present so it seems that so far as Gmail is concerned those strings are something you might eventually be able to click thus they are URLs.

Since about a few weeks ago, I am now seeing at least a 95% rejection rate
for my domain name, for ALL email, including the forwards.

My experience says that: their system has learned that your system(s) continued to send messages that their user (yes you, but they don't know that) did not want, i.e., you left it marked as SPAM or deleted it without reading the message, or at least not enough was noted as not SPAM *and* read (aka displayed, and not for half a second either) so as to influence their AI, which makes mistakes and will never correct them if not fed correcting info.


/mark

Reply via email to