Unfortunately not too much help, but previous discussion on this turned up fairly empty: https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2019-May/101016.html https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2017-September/092416.html
-- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:02 PM Brandon Price <pri...@sherwoodoregon.gov> wrote: > Hey Nanog, > > > > I am in the process of building out a FTTH proof of concept, and I would > really like to offer each of my customers a /48 of IPv6. > > I’ve been able to announce my /32 to my upstreams, dual-stack all of my > internal infrastructure no-problem, build v6 recursive name servers, etc. > > This was fairly straight-forward. > > > > Where I am struggling is the Prefix Delegation part. How are most folks > getting the PD subnets into their IGPs? In my environment I don’t run the > DHCP server process on the router that is directly connected to the > clients. I have seen documentation that cisco and juniper DHCPv6 processes > are smart enough to insert that prefix into the routing table when they > hand it out, but how is this handled in an environment with a central DHCP > server? I do not currently run any PPPOE in my environment and I don’t use > RADIUS for the subscriber management. I would really just like to stick to > DHCP ideally. > > > > If anyone has any pointers, I would appreciate it. > > > > Brandon Price > > Senior Network Engineer > > City of Sherwood, Sherwood Broadband > > Desk: 503.625.4258 > > Cell: 971.979.2182 > > > > This email may contain confidential information or privileged material and > is intended for use solely by the above referenced recipient. Any review, > copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other > person or entity is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you are not > the named recipient, or believe you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify the City of Sherwood at (503) 625-5522 and delete > the copy you received. >
