> On Feb 6, 2020, at 2:38 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote: > > > It would likely be a lot better than "someone on NANOG noticed a > discrepancy let's shout at each other about it for a few days." Did I miss something? I thought the discrepancy being pointed out was that resources that were not currently allocated/assigned were still being actively used and actively accepted by people who should have rejected them. Private address space and private ASNs are one case, resources that have not yet been allocated or were once allocated and have been reclaimed are another. An accounting audit of ARIN resource management process is not going to help the fact that people are accepting routes they should not be accepting. I suspect I did miss something. —Sandy
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Mark Andrews
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Wayne Bouchard
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Marco Belmonte
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Pierfrancesco Caci
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Brendan Carlson
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Tom Beecher
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 bzs
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Sandra Murphy
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 bzs
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 thomas brenac via NANOG
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 John Curran
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Shane Ronan
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Tell me about AS19111 John Levine