On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:37 PM Denys Fedoryshchenko < nuclear...@nuclearcat.com> wrote:
> There is simple use case that will prove this page is giving false > positive > for their "name&shame" strategy. > Any AS owner with default route only (yes it happens a lot) users will > get: > "YOUR ISP TERRIBLE, HIS BGP NOT SAFE!". > But he have nothing to validate! His BGP is implemented safely, > its just his upstream is not validating routes. > > So, that same ISP who is not validating because it has a default route could push its providers to do validation and then be as safe as other validating themselves ? Rubens
