Take a look at DANOS for CG-NAT as a free solution or Netgate's TNSR has a CG-NAT feature https://www.tnsr.com/features
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:57 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > I will say it is much better to consider 464XLAT with NAT64, if the CPEs > allow it. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8683/ > > > > I’m right now doing a deployment for 25.000.000 customers of an ISP (GPON, > DLS and cellular mix), all the testing has been done, and all doing fine. > > > > I’ve done it already for smaller ISPs, but the size of this project is > more interesting to better demonstrate that it just works. > > > > I plan to do a presentation when the information can be made public … bit > delay because the Covid-19 confinement. > > > > Regards, > > Jordi > > @jordipalet > > > > > > > > El 28/4/20 21:15, "NANOG en nombre de John Alcock" < > nanog-boun...@nanog.org en nombre de j...@alcock.org> escribió: > > > > Afternoon, > > > > I run a small ISP in Tennessee. COVID has forced a lot of people to work > from home. I am starting to run low on IP's and need to consider CGNAT. > > > > I do have IPV6 space, but we all know that until we force everyone to move > to IPV6, we need to keep IPV4 up and running. > > > > I could buy more space, but I am really wondering if that is the > best option. It is expensive. I know CGNAT devices are expensive as well, > but it looks like I could stretch it out a bit. > > > > My thinking is to convert about 50% of my subscribers to CGNAT. > > > > I am interested in vendors or devices you have used in the past. I > already know about the pitfalls many of my subscribers will have with CGNAT > such as VPN's, Gamers, etc. > > > > What are your thoughts on CGNAT vendors? > > > > A10Networks > > F5Networks > > Others? > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or > use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > >