Respectfully:

How can something be deployed if it doesn't even exist?

I think we'd all be better off focusing on deploying real things with real 
implementations--you know, like IPv6... And not debating the merits of a 
protocol that doesn't exist except in.. Umm.. "theory".

And I'll save you some research. I'm not part of some ipv6 spamhaus illuminati 
group. Kinda wish I was--I've always wanted to be part of an exclusive club.

-Neil

On May 13, 2020, 17:31, at 17:31, Elad Cohen <e...@netstyle.io> wrote:
>LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be
>deployed.
>________________________________
>From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard
><dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com>
>Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
>To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
>Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>
>I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4
>because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained
>questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.
>
>
>
>From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus....@nanog.org> on
>behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com>
>Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
>To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
>Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>
>
>Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:
>
>
>
>https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html
>
>
>
>Some internet service providers may have more than half of their
>traffic as IPv6.
>
>
>
>Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:
>
>
>
>https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
>
>
>
>Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to
>abandon the work already done?

Reply via email to