On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:40 AM Dave Bell <m...@geordish.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 18:42, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> > Why do we really need SR? Be it SR-MPLS or SRv6 or SRv6+? >> >> I don't like this, SR-MPLS and SRv6 are just utterly different things >> to me, and no answer meaningfully applies to both. >> > > I don't understand the point of SRv6. What equipment can support IPv6 > routing, but can't support MPLS label switching? > > I'm a big fan of SR-MPLS however. > > One of the advantages cited for SRv6 over MPLS is that the packet contains a record of where it has been.
