On 21/Jun/20 12:45, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> > Yes I once made a plan to have one VRF per transit provider plus a > peering VRF. That way our BGP customers could have a session with each > of those VRFs to allow them full control of the route mix. I would of > course also need a Internet VRF for our own needs. > > But the reality of that would be too many copies of the DFZ in the > routing tables. Although not necessary in the FIB as each of the > transit VRFs could just have a default route installed. We just opted for BGP communities :-). Mark.
