> > I'd be down with that. Gamers will kill for even 1 nanosecond of lower > "ping" :-). >
Which has long made me chuckle. It's analogous to the golfers buying things to "fix your slice!" or "get 10 more yards!" , when the true reason those things happen is completely your swing. :) On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 9:19 AM Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.com> wrote: > > > On 26/Jun/20 19:40, Sabri Berisha wrote: > > > Don't hold your breath. It's most likely not related to the capabilities > > of the hardware, or even the kernel running on the platform. > > I'm hoping a new device will bring with it renewed vigour :-). > > I'm probably being ambitious. Overly. > > > > My guess is that there is no IPv6 support because the backend doesn't > > support it. I've seen this at previous employers where the network was > ready > > for IPv6, but back-end applications were lagging. And that might require > > development on a lot of games as well. > > > > Perhaps we should start a rumor: "IPv6 has a lower ping!". We'll get > > thousands of gamers protesting for v6 in front of Sony's HQ :) > > I'd be down with that. Gamers will kill for even 1 nanosecond of lower > "ping" :-). > > Which is quite at odds with a flats screen TV I bought from Sony back in > 2015 that supported IPv6 - and this was Sony's own OS, not a 3rd party > one some of their current units ship with. The good ol' silo problem, > perhaps... > > Mark. >