On 18/Jul/20 15:31, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > > Well luckily we have MEF to set expectations about ones > EPL/EVPL/EPLAN/EVPLAN performance. (and formal SLA contracts > describing every single aspect of the service and its performance). > > Anyways, when I was designing these the back in the days when it was > cool and demand was high, customers (other carriers) were getting > MTU9100 (to fit customers MTU9000), the whole CFM & LFM shebang (to > the point made earlier in the thread that the link should go down on > both ends -like it’s the case with a wave) and sub 50ms convergence in > case something when wrong inside our backbone. > > > > We as a provider got more $$$ from single investment to our > wave/fiber, but our customers could enjoy p2p links on par with wave > for less $. >
It's probably worth noting that easily 90% of all remote peering circuits are running over an EoMPLS service, FWIW. Mark.
