> > Clearly to virtualize operating systems as long as your level of > virtualization mainly in terms of security and resource consumption > isolation & reservation is satisfactory is a much better and lighter > option. >
That pretty much sums up Intel's view. To quote an Intel executive I was corresponding with: "The purpose of the paper was to showcase how Communication Service Providers can move to a more nimble and future proof microservices based network architecture with cloud native functions, via container deployment methodologies versus virtual machines. The paper cites many benefits of moving to a microservices architecture beyond whether it is done in a VM environment or cloud native. We believe the 5G networks of the future will benefit greatly by implementing such an approach to deploying new services." The paper referred to is this one <https://www.intel.in/content/www/in/en/communications/why-containers-and-cloud-native-functions-paper.html> . Cheers, Etienne On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 6:23 PM Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote: > I reason that Intel's implication is that virtualization is becoming >> obsolete. >> Would anyone care to let me know his thoughts on this prediction? >> > > Virtualization is not becoming obsolete ... quite reverse in fact in all > types of deployments I can see around. > > The point is that VM provides hardware virtualization while kubernetes > with containers virtualize OS apps and services are running on in > isolation. > > Clearly to virtualize operating systems as long as your level of > virtualization mainly in terms of security and resource consumption > isolation & reservation is satisfactory is a much better and lighter > option. > > Thx, > R. > > -- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
