On 12/Aug/20 10:50, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > This point plays straight up the path of the argument I recounted. > > Yes, I agree that there's a relational problem inherent to the > situation I described. > Wouldn't any wise employer playing the relationship game ensure that > he's got cards to play? > And wouldn't the standardization approach be part of the deck? In theory, yes. But the department most interested in this might be HR, while the ones most able to implement it will be the CTO team. Until NOG's start having breakout sessions on employee-employer dynamics, or until HR conferences start thinking about telecoms industry orchestration standardizations to mitigate employee-employer dynamics, it will remain a theory :-). Mark.
- Re: Has virtualization... Christopher Morrow
- Re: Has virtualization... Mark Tinka
- Re: Has virtualization... Valdis Klētnieks
- RE: Has virtualization... adamv0025
- Re: Has virtualization... Mark Tinka
- RE: Has virtualization... adamv0025
- Re: Has virtualization... Mark Tinka
- Re: Has virtualization... Etienne-Victor Depasquale
- Re: Has virtualization... Mark Tinka
- Re: Has virtualization... Etienne-Victor Depasquale
- Re: Has virtualization... Mark Tinka
- RE: Has virtualization... adamv0025
- Re: Has virtualization... Mark Tinka
- RE: Has virtualization... adamv0025
- Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5... Mark Tinka
- RE: Has virtualization become obsolete ... adamv0025
- Re: Has virtualization become obsol... Mark Tinka
- Re: Has virtualization become o... Etienne-Victor Depasquale
- Re: Has virtualization bec... Mark Tinka
- Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G? Mike Hammett
- Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G? David Monosov