On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:55 PM Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > >>> So, I was searching on how to solve that and I found a draft (8th release) > >>> with the intention to solve that... > >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-08 > >>> > >>> If understood correctly, the effective implementation of it will depend on > >>> new code on any BGP engine that will want to do that check. > >>> It is kind of frustrating... At least 10 years after the release of RFC > >>> until the refresh os every router involved in IXPs in the world. > >> > >> you have a better (== easier to implement and deploy) signaling path? > >> > >> the draft passed wglc in 1948. it is awaiting two implementations, as > >> is the wont of the idr wg. > > > > I think you also mean to say: "this is actually still a DRAFT and not > > an RFC, so really no BGP implementor is beholden to this document, > > unless they have coin bearing customers who wish to see this feature > > implemented" > > if i had meant to say that, i probably would have. no one on this > thread has called it anything other than a draft, so i am quite unsure > what your point is; and i will not put words in your mouth.
I think the OP said: " At least 10 years after the release of RFC > >>> until the refresh os every router involved in IXPs in the world." it's not an rfc yet. > sadly, these years, vendors do not seem to care a lot about drafts, > rfcs, ... anything which sells. sure :(
