Once upon a time, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> said: > On 12/25/20 12:40 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > >The other aspect of it is that we're doing these downloads while > >continuing to play other games and chat (both things sensitive to > >latency). Some have family/roommates in the home, so they may be > >streaming audio and/or video at the same time. Do we fill up a gigabit? > >No, probably not... but we'd notice if we had a lot less. > > But using the right queuing disciplines it a lot cheaper than the > brute force and ignorance of just upping the bandwidth, right?
Queueing doesn't get me my next game in time to play it tonight. I've always seen general queueing as a work-around for "not enough bandwidth and can't add more"... but when more is available, why not just use more? -- Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net>