Yeah he did the same dolt act to me to. Just a really bored dolt looking for nonsense with a crush on AOC.
-- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. > On Jan 19, 2021, at 00:40, Javier J <jav...@advancedmachines.us> wrote: > > > you too, why are you emailing me? > > I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list. > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester <sam.silves...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political types >> out of the discussion? >> >>> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J <jav...@advancedmachines.us> >>> wrote: >>> I couldn't agree more. >>> If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this mailing >>> list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of networks >>> in North American and other places. >>> >>> - Javier >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: >>>> javier, >>>> >>>> I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to >>>> “reign in” our discussions on political grounds! >>>> >>>> -mel beckman >>>> >>>>> On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J <jav...@advancedmachines.us> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I agree 100%. >>>>> >>>>> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't >>>>> appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address >>>>> list because of someone's behavior. >>>>> >>>>> - Javier >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: >>>>>> There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be >>>>>> private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders." >>>>>> The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it, >>>>>> should result in their removal from the list, at least until they >>>>>> explain >>>>>> what caused them to do that and have undone it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> >> Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what >>>>>> >> is the >>>>>> >> policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing >>>>>> >> offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that >>>>>> >> someone. >>>>>> >> Anne >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law >>>>>> >> Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School >>>>>> >> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam >>>>>> >> law) >>>>>> >> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange >>>>>> >> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop >>>>>> >> Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route >>>>>> StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are >>>>>> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________